It's a significant topic news drop moment, when Google shifts their algorithms for the sake of establishing more meaningful and worthwhile results.
/>
Here's what I've noticed, or drawn inferences on:
For example:
Well, okay. Here's a peek at my personal account's web browsing stats, here and now, on the 25th of June, 2020 (evening):
That being said, (and shown, in this photo), I'd reasonably been well-traveled, in recent weeks, or months, that it might be, for the sake of drawing inferences as towards what had established itself as "different," once the news broke about Google once more updating their search basis algorithms.
But of on: ...•^°\~`* . . ?
There seems to have, instead of algorithmic methodology underpinnings, per se, have had been what seems, instead, to be an assimilation, or all-out adoption, thereof, of popular development and project management culture-aesthetics.
One thing I noticed was that the news feeds tended more towards astute offerings, of the most-cutting edge of latest and up to the minute, as of hours within publication timestamp, of that the article had been published (to reiterate). Here, in my newsfeeds, and, that Google had also broke news of increased support for their project known as the Google News Initiative
For decades we have worked with publishers to grow audiences and build value. We continue that progress today with the introduction of a licensing program to pay publishers for high-quality content. https://t.co/QOeilMxnM7
— Sundar Pichai (@sundarpichai) June 25, 2020
So the News is astute, and that's somewhat a basis of privileged placement for the sake of more back end work, within the context of composing an article, in that rich and structured formalities, coding snippets, customizations, and personalizations of the HTML code, for example, are completed, along with establishment of terms and agreements between news publishers on Google's news feeds. It's a fortunate place to be featured - in front of the eyes and daily flitters of fingers about on the devices, particularly, on Android, imaginably, which is one of the significant offshoot development projects of Google, as well.
As far as search results: rich results, on Google, for perhaps, the sake of Google's investments in small businesses, for example - recent as of this week:
this week just happened to be International Small Business week. With the national financial, health, and housing crises at hand, as well as some significant support for the social unrest movements that have been going on, many small business, it'd been reported, were in threat of defaulting upon their business forgiveness loans, for example, and where the Federal government had been juggling proposals and news topic bias, and attending Town Halls, (conceivably), where some people were afforded an opportunity to voice their media publishing outlet in their own personal or professional way, and slight moment's of small miracles were observed, of the recent passing days - of things that were good about the American establishment - to continue forth in society, and upheavals all around, somewhat, and to acknowledge that failures do happen in life, yet that we are all neighbors and fellow countrymen, women, people, and children. Nature beside us, our workweek at hand, etc. etc. Stuff about a weekend, and a Sunday for rest, and for observation of the holy day of the Sabbath. Those had been topics largely on my mind.
Anyhow, I found that the underlying motive belying my personal and .institute website development domain's search results were that they were of a lean basis, given that the rich and structured site results had been established through Blogger's page options, trends, tags, and such (succinctly), I'd offer that I didn't used to have structured search results...
Then there was my Facebook page, and the .com « same » branded site, of ipigeon, (a pigeon auction site),
and then there was my YouTube « Brand » site, which, I suppose, could some day see some development of pigeon and sparrow fan-action in pro-active moves I could make. I dunno. I'd have to work out some difficult facial things, for that to happen. I have this excitement moment when the camera catches my eye, yet I can't focus on myself, in the video monitor, for composure. Needs some work, but at least, my YouTube does feature pigeon videos.
Some various assorted pages, the military pigeon Google Books offering, the Google Images search results, all of these things showed up in the search results, yet there weren't hundreds of pages available for show, for the fact of that of on lean, perhaps, as the short and slim explanation, for what I somewhat consider "good enough."
That's about what I could make of it, so far, as for this one. How did other content publishers fare, in this new metrics decisiveness and establishment?
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment